Sunday, Feb 05, 2012
Login

Archive for November, 2007

Hasta La Vista

Nothing fits better than that phrase.  After using Vista for several months I’ve reverted back to XP and quite happy with the decision.  Vista is everything I like visually and even a lot of the functionality but beyond that it’s flaming pile of dung.  I could have waited for SP1 or tried the release candidate but I’ll save that for my laptop.

The first thing I did while installing was remove UAC and the system ran very well.  I noticed it wasn’t quite as fast as XP but I traded it for the visually appealing look and how it functioned.  The honeymoon was shorter than Britney Spears first, then again maybe a little bit longer than that.  The slowdown continued to get worse, the application timeouts were numerous and WTH was Microsoft thinking with the search function?

The search is one of the worst concocted items with the new OS.  I’d do a search, it’d indicate that it could search faster if indexed (with my understanding of XP, I thought, sure!).  Eventually I started noticing my search process taking up HUGE chunks of memory.  I found where it stored the “indexing” and killed them and it restored some speed.  What’s odd is that the search function seems to have been built for a monkey.  It’s not that the XP built in feature is great (it doesn’t find a lot of items inside of a file) but it’s at least easy to click something like *.bmp, *.gif, *.jpg, etc. and return all the extensions I want.  I’m sure there is some other way to do it in Vista but why remove the simplicity that was in XP?  It was also a lot worse than XP when attempting to search within files (which is hard to do).  Regardless they need to overhaul the search.

The timeout on applications and even explorer are ridiculous.  I’m using an application such as Word 2003 and out of nowhere (and while typing with no apparent issues), it stops responding losing whatever I had done since the last save.  Worst is in graphic programs where you don’t save every minute and lose a crap load of work.  I’ve had issues where I’m browsing a network drive and suddenly Explorer just crashes with no signs of an issue.

Games kicked off slower and frame rates were significantly lower than on XP.  Anyone who says they’re running Vista and getting 100+ frames on an 8800GTS (as I have) running at high resolutions (which they rarely include their resolution) with high effects on games like UT3 are full of it.  It’s simply not happening or they’re leaving out that it’s at 800×600 or with dual cards (which I still suspect is not the case in terms of FPS).

Again, as opposed to a lot of others, I like what the OS is about but they did a piss poor job of implementation and optimization.   We’ll see how the release candidate of SP1 does on my laptop but unlike previous versions of Microsoft OSes, I have a feeling that I’ll not jump until potentially SP2 is released or I see some substantial increases on my laptop.


Unreal Tournament 3

So far I’m liking UT3 and my xFire time shows it. :) Warfare is fun and they added some stuff to Onslaught that wasn’t there in 2004. I’m hoping they make some interface tweaks soon to remove the console feel. I don’t get the other references to console game from people on the official forums. They throw comments out about the graphics but apparently they have no clue that companies optimize code based on platform, not the same graphics, etc. across the board. The gameplay may be the same, the interface may be the same but when people bitch about the graphics I don’t get it. I think the graphics are well done but they have a feel that I can only explain as “over textured”, I can’t put my finger on it but maybe it’s just the next gen look much like Crysis, which is incredibly well done but has been put on hold by me until I have more time with my baby UT3.

Anyway, I have a server up and running… Drop in and play! ;) Also check out my UT site.

Was nice to see this…

Good going for now...


I wanted to get something up since I’ve been busy with the UT3Online site and gaming. ;)


Battlefield 2142 1.40 Patch

The Battlefield 2142 1.40 patch has finally arrived after months of beta status….Apparently you can download it on the EA Downloader but I clicked on the “OK” in game, it started EA Downloader which showed Northern Strike and the BF2 xpacks but never showed the patch.  I don’t expect much else from EA.  I ended up downloading it from FilePlanet.

You can read my previous bitch about EA/DICE on BF2142 here. I didn’t play the Tampa Highway map during the 1.40 beta, I had tried out the beta and liked the fact that weapons actually stay from map to map but not tired the new map, Tampa Highway. The map isn’t too bad but as I had indicated in my last post EA/DICE continues to try to get people into other mods rather than catering to what people play the most. Tampa Highway is another sparse, large map with little grunt fighting. It’s to the point in this map where you can grab a tank at almost any base you may be at and again it’s an Assault Lines/Titan map.

For some reason they seem to think if they beat it into people enough that they’ll stop playing conquest for their alternatives. Again I’m not putting down the other mods but what the hell? Why is it so hard to just give people what they want and not try and club them with what the developers think players want?

Anyway I said enough in the prior post. Here’s a few shots from Tampa Highway in Assault Lines mode.

BF2142-2007-11-14-04-44-00-15
BF2142-2007-11-14-04-46-45-17
BF2142-2007-11-14-04-44-20-88

Site Updates

I’ve updated WordPress and Gallery2 to the latest versions. Right now I’m not so sure I’m happy with the WordPress update but it’s in and it’s set so no going back. I also changed the themes for both and did quite a bit of updating to them to try to integrate the site better. I also went with some color in this version of BREWTALITY. ;)

etqw-2007-11-01-00-01-45-38
UT3Demo-2007-10-25-00-43-12-07

Toy of the Week: Cannon MP970 All-In-One

I was looking around recently at getting some of my old pictures converted from 35mm negatives to digital. After looking at the pricing offered through both companies specializing in this and local camera shops/retail stores I was in awe at the prices they charged. The lowest price I found was $0.50/image and they charged around $5 for a CD and I’m not sure for a DVD. Even the person at the local camera store suggested I buy a scanner and do it myself since they had them starting at around $100.

Rather than adding another device to my work area, I opted to look around at replacing my 1 year old HP C5180 AiO. It’s a good printer/scanner with network and card reader support but it would be cheaper to sell it off with a stack of photo paper, etc. and just go for what I found to have what I was looking for, which included the 35mm negative scanner, card reader and network connectivity. I found the MP970.




 

Calendar

November 2007
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Amazon Search

Radio Vietnam

Winamp Playlist